Ebullient: cheerful and full of energy.
“As our circle of knowledge expands, so does the circumference of darkness surrounding it.”
There’s a fine line between jealousy and inspiration. My most recent
jealousy inspiration is Susan J. Fowler. Obviously I’m not jealous of her for the only reason most of us know her name – her sexual harassment at the hands of her employer, Uber, which was then made newsworthy by the fact that Uber’s HR department defended and protected the harasser. No, I checked out her blog. And this woman can do everything. Write. Write code. Write about code. Speak. Start businesses. Write/edit philosophy papers. Professionally and reasonably navigate a traumatic situation. Be young and beautiful. And more than anything, believe in herself.
Self belief is about impossible to impart to another person, and it is just as impossible to describe in a worthwhile manner. But it is key. I have a friend who’s an engineer, generated 7 million dollars for his company through an endeavor he largely spearheaded, speaks internationally, wrote and published a book, is now a CTO of a small company, and is 26. Yes, 26. That man swims in self belief. You can see it as he walks down the halls. Swagger. Fashion. Everybody knows Bill. I suppose it’s a perfect constellation of factors coming together: drive, physical health and high energy, talent converging with the right industry as it’s rising (tech), through-the-roof social ability, and straight-up good old standard intelligence.
But back to Susan. She read 52 books last year. Wow. I will never do that and I will not try. A key difference, I imagine, is she’s likely not spending 5 hours a week at the gym. Were I to spend my gym time reading, sure, a book a week would be doable.
Another inspiration is that she truly feels STEM is her home (Science Technology Engineering Math). She doesn’t even hesitate. I am yet part of the phenomenon and error that says that women can’t compete in STEM. I can feel it in my soul. I meet another female engineer/developer and I’m always impressed. Why? Why am I impressed?! Do I think women can’t write code? See. I am part of the problem. And this despite the fact that I live this life (I write code for a living), was valedictorian of my high school (i.e. beat all the boys), and am aware that American girls have had equal math scores with their male counterparts for the past 30 years. There are no grounds to the lie that women aren’t equal to men in intellectual ability, but STEM and technology still do not reflect this truth. Technology is 90% male. Still a boys club. And she got the brunt of it here, and Uber lost a high performer because of their sick culture/boys club.
But, goals! This is all about goals, for me. Susan – a woman I have never met and never will – has inspired me.
- I will read 12 books this year. One per month.
- I will post to this blog once per month.
And I will deepen my current goals, which are giving of myself to my local church, and studying a few hours each weekend on the philosophical/religious ideas that plague, pursue, entertain, and give me life.
Thank you Susan! Thanks for being brave and ignoring your gender because in our society females are still “less than”.
While the problems of the world may be more interesting to talk about, I can’t do anything about them. What I can do however is bake cakes. So I have. And honestly that Chocolate and Raspberry cake is one of the best things to ever happen to me. They were baked in one day; that takes about 7 hours. And they are all gluten free. The supporting actors are: Pistachio and Chocolate Tart, Key Lime Pie, and Banana Cupcakes with a Maple Cream Frosting.
This post was supposed to be about “food as therapy” and/or “baking as therapy”. But apparently I need to go to bed, so that post will come another day.
Tennis players peak at the age of 25. But Roger Federer, at age 35, just won the Australian Open. He beat his biggest rival on the biggest stage with the *GOAT in question and in one of the most difficult ways: a 5-set match against a man who’s in his head (psychological demons, if you will), directly after an injury hiatus of 6 months, and had to beat 4 top-10 players along the way which hasn’t been done in 35 years.
It was a beautiful thing. And this article summarizes it much better.
Congrats Fed. You’re an inspiration.
*GOAT = Greatest Of All Time
“a new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
Faced with the following dilemma, what do you do: vote for a good man with bad policy, or a bad man with good policy?
Obviously my question is inspired by the 2016 US Presidential race.
Obama is a good man, but his policies may not be ones I agree with.
Trump is a bad man, but (if we knew his policies) I may agree with them.
So, for the sake of argument, let’s imagine I actually know Trump’s policies and agree with them.
And, because Barack is a bit more interesting to me than Hillary, let’s say Trump is running against Barack Obama.
Do you vote for a leader primarily because of their policies? Or do you vote for them primarily because of who they are?
Let’s put this another way. Which factor carries more weight: a leader’s intended policy or his character?
This is unfortunately impossible to measure so the answer is ultimately personal, subjective, and eternally nebulous in value.
But it’s still a good thought exercise.
I can see a party, The Republican Party, ushering in a man who verbally and physically mistreats women, yet as Obama said: “You claim the mantle of the party of family values, and this is the guy you nominate,”. A better point I couldn’t have made myself.
I don’t know how individuals get chosen by a party, in great detail, so I can’t say exactly how this inconsistency was given life. Perhaps the Republican Party was never the party of family values? Or perhaps, like all individuals on earth, the party is trying to achieve a goal and isn’t always succeeding.
Here’s the deal with a head of a democracy: they are only a head. The 535 congressmen, judicial system, and millions serving in government agencies limit his power by having power of their own. This ultimately makes the answer easy: you vote for a good man with bad policy.
Why? The effects of his policy will be limited by all the other parts of government, but no one can stop the affects of his image, his person, his attitude, his style of thinking. And, unfortunately, this is the hardest to measure. But we are less rational creatures than we’d like to think. Therefore, I think the policy intentions of one limited man mean far less than the content of his character. Which of the things your parents told you do you remember? Practically nothing. What of who they are do you remember? Basically all of it. What we remember, and therefore what we are compelled by, is the character of a person.
Is Barak Obama inspiring? You bet. The husband of one wife, molester of none, and who can put together a sentence. Is Trump inspiring? Only to tears. The husband of three, molester of some, and who has difficulty constructing a sentence of any sophistication (let alone depth).
Also character affects policy. A bad man can’t be trusted. But a good man (please forgive the over simplicity) first can be trusted and is aware of his own frailty, which in turn means open to change. So, if push comes to shove, prioritizing morality over policy makes sense. In theory.
In reality, we have a bad man (of sorts) heading a good country (of sorts) down a path invisible to nearly all of us (because, again, what are his policies?!?). I distinctly think the primary reason we don’t know his policies is that he doesn’t either.
May God Bless America.